August 2007 ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å "THE WAR ON TALK RADIO"
Though most Americans aren't yet aware of it, talk radio ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å from Rush Limbaugh to the local talker in small-town America ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å is under major attack, reports the August issue of WND's acclaimed Whistleblower magazine, titled "THE WAR ON TALK RADIO."
And no wonder: In 2007 radio talkers presided over a minor American revolution when they urged millions of citizens to successfully oppose the immigration/amnesty bill that the president and both political parties had been pushing relentlessly. It went down in flames ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å a devastating blow to the political establishment.
Now it's revenge time. If radio talkers, in conjunction with the Internet, can mobilize Americans to oppose the political elite with regard to immigration, what kind of effect might they have on voters during the presidential election just around the corner? The fact is, powerful forces in and out of politics feel extremely threatened by this one part of the mass media that overwhelmingly champions traditional American values.
In short: They want talk radio crippled before it does any more "damage."
Ironically, virtually the entire "Old Media," including the broadcast networks, major daily newspapers, news magazines and wire services like the Associated Press, represent views far to the left of Middle America, as every study for the past three decades has proven conclusively. It is only talk radio and the Internet ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å the "New Media" ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å that provide any balance and fairness to what has until recently been a leftist media monopoly.
As the incendiary August 2007 issue of Whistleblower magazine proves, "THE WAR ON TALK RADIO" is rapidly heating up and involves many different types of attacks. Some are already well under way, some waiting in the wings, some out in the open, some behind the scenes. All are intended to throttle talk radio.
Some of the attacks are congressional, such as the controversial "Fairness Doctrine" which would legally require that views expressed on a radio talk show be "balanced" with opposing views ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å a surefire formula for destroying talk radio, critics contend. But beyond the "Fairness Doctrine," which was defeated ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å for the time being ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å in 2007, Sen. John Kerry has gone so far as to call for bringing back the equal-time provisions. That would mandate not just "fairness" in broadcasts ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å by forcibly requiring that "conservative" views be balanced with "liberal" views ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å but actual minute-for-minute, second-by-second measurements of what is said on the public airwaves.
Some of the attacks on talk radio are quiet and technical ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å like proposals to force minority ownership on radio stations in an effort to get a more left-leaning worldview on the air. That would be accomplished by: 1) limiting how many radio stations one company can own, 2) shortening broadcast license terms, 3) requiring radio broadcasters to regularly show they are operating in the "public interest" and 4) believe it or not, imposing a fee on broadcasters who fail to meet these "public interest obligations" with the funding to go to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting!
Other attacks are more public and sensational ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å like the efforts of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton against talk show hosts. After successfully leading the charge against talker Don Imus for using a watered-down version of the coarse language that permeates today's black music industry, Sharpton said: "It is our feeling that this is only the beginning. We must have a broad discussion on what is permitted and not permitted in terms of the airwaves." Talk radio executives are convinced Jackson and Sharpton are sharpening their knives to go after more talk hosts for "abuse of the airwaves."
Still other attacks are based on charges of "bigotry and hate speech." Currently, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Neal Boortz, John Gibson and Michael Smerconish have all been declared to be under scrutiny for their on-air "hate speech."
Highlights of this issue include:
- "Al-Qaida and the Fairness Doctrine" by Joseph Farah
- "The real fight over talk radio is yet to come" by James L. Gattuso, who shows that radio censors have many other weapons beyond Fairness Doctrine
- "Congress and the Un-Fairness Doctrine," in which James Gattuso reveals how historically both political parties have used the pretense of "fairness" to ruthlessly thwart their opposition
- "The day 'New Media' was born" by Joseph Farah, who reveals that it was the forward thinking of none other than Ronald Reagan who facilitated the explosion of talk radio
- "Democrats hope to 'hush Rush,'" examining why Sen. Diane Feinstein says she's "looking at" bringing back the Fairness Doctrine, complaining that talk radio is "overwhelmingly one way"
- "Claim: Hillary, Boxer look to 'fix' talk radio," in which Sen. James Inhofe says his Democrat colleagues want to take legislative action
- "Voinovich self-destructs on Hannity," a stunning account of how the senator hung up on the talk host after showing himself to be clueless on the Fairness Doctrine and on the "amnesty" bill
- "The Imus lynch party" by Pat Buchanan, showing what's really behind the attacks by Sharpton and Jackson
- "'It's not just Imus,' warn talk-radio headhunters," a chilling survey of attacks on top talkers like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage for alleged "hate speech"
- "CAIR's war on talk radio" by Michelle Malkin, showing how the controversial Islamic group is pushing for the 'Al Jazeera-fication of America's airwaves'
- "3 sneak attacks coming against talk radio," detailing the methods for regulating the airwaves most favored by anti-talk-radio activists
- "Air America recovering after bankruptcy woes," profiling how the left-leaning radio network is doing since it filed for Chapter 11 protection last year
- "Making talk radio fair and balanced" ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å a view from "progressive" pundit Bill Press defending the "Fairness Doctrine" and saying the real problem is that conservatives fear competition
- "Why can't liberal talk radio succeed?" by Hal Lindsey, who insightfully points out that although some leftist hosts may be funny, their opinions aren't convincing
- "Introducing the Broadcaster Freedom Act" by U.S. Rep. Mike Pence, explaining his bill designed to protect talk radio, and proclaiming that "There is nothing fair about the Fairness Doctrine"
- Rush Limbaugh: Regulate the 'Drive-By Media'" by Joe Kovacs, who reports that America's #1 radio talker suggests that, rather than impose a "Fairness Doctrine," perhaps a "Truth Doctrine" should be imposed to control all news outlets other than talk radio!
- "God, man and talk radio" by veteran talker Bob Just, on the rise and fall of the secular media monopoly
"America is short on leadership right now," said WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah. "Radio talk show hosts, who every day belt out the truth that no one else in the broadcast world dares to speak, are the closest thing today's Americans have to real leadership. Eliminate talk radio and America goes down the tubes. That fact makes this an extremely important issue of Whistleblower ÌÎÌ_ÌÎ__ÌÎÌ_Ì´åÇÌÎå«Ì´å to read and to share with others.
For a 12-month subscription to Whistleblower, click here.
If you wish to order by phone, call our toll-free order line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).